In which case was the presumption favoring the release of defendants on their own recognizance reinforced?

The case that reinforced the presumption in favor of releasing defendants on their own recognizance is Stack v. Boyle. In this landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court emphasized the principle that bail should not be set excessively high and that the default position should favor release, particularly when there is no risk of flight or danger to the community. This case established that the ability of individuals to remain free while awaiting trial should be a presumption unless there are compelling reasons to justify their detention, highlighting the importance of ensuring that the right to bail is not abused.

In contrast, other cases mentioned, such as US v. Salerno, focused on the denial of bail in instances where the defendant poses a significant risk to public safety, thus allowing for detention under specific circumstances. Miranda v. Arizona deals with the rights of suspects during police interrogations, and Cunningham v. North Carolina pertains to sentencing practices, making them less relevant to the presumption of pretrial release. Therefore, Stack v. Boyle stands out as the case that specifically reinforced the principle of recognizing the right to pretrial release on one's own recognizance.